There are several foods that can be construed as junk when consumed a certain way, such as cheese or ground beef. The definition of what constitutes a junk food item is very broad and difficult to ascertain. Not only will people be encouraged to eat healthier, but manufacturers are also spurred to create healthier alternatives for a newly weight conscious population. There are many who will make the appropriate changes to their diet, because they are no longer able to afford the expenses associated with a junk food reliance. Some of these reasons are logistical, while some are financial, as no employer wishes to provide insurance coverage to a worker who is more likely to have severe health related issues. Many workplaces do not hire those who are heavyset, for a variety of reasons. One of the main obstacles for many obese people is the ability to find gainful employment. Since most people are who are addicted to junk food do not have the ability While this may be considered problematic to many, for government bodies that wish to provide themselves with an increased revenue stream, this is a huge boon to their bottom line. Simply raising the taxes on junk food is not enough to make people stop their consumption. In order to learn more about the pros and cons associated with a junk food tax, read on. A junk food tax has been proposed and as you might have expected, it has caused quite the commotion among observers. Finally, we discuss several things that should be done after the initial development of a scale to examine its generalizability and to enhance its usefulness.For the first time, choosing to consume fatty foods may finally cost a citizen much more money than it has in the past. Following this, we discuss each of the steps in the scale development process while paying particular attention to the differences that are required when one is attempting to develop scales for constructs with formative indicators as opposed to constructs with reflective indicators. First, we briefly elaborate upon some of the limitations of current scale development practices. Therefore, the purpose of the present paper is to integrate new and existing techniques into a comprehensive set of recommendations that can be used to give researchers in MIS and the behavioral sciences a framework for developing valid measures.
#CONSTRUCT 3 PROS AND CONS HOW TO#
Undoubtedly, part of the problem is that many of the scale development procedures advocated in the literature are limited by the fact that they (1) fail to adequately discuss how to develop appropriate conceptual definitions of the focal construct, (2) often fail to properly specify the measurement model that relates the latent construct to its indicators, and (3) underutilize techniques that provide evidence that the set of items used to represent the focal construct actually measures what it purports to measure. Despite the fact that validating the measures of constructs is critical to building cumulative knowledge in MIS and the behavioral sciences, the process of scale development and validation continues to be a challenging activity.
0 kommentar(er)
